JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 23 October 2003 * In Case C-408/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Hog
An evaluation of the view: “Dilution should be recognized as a form of damage in passing off as it is in the law of registered trade marks.” — KIIPS
![The battle of the “three stripes” continues: Adidas vs. Thom Browne | BRANDIT - Making brands feel at home The battle of the “three stripes” continues: Adidas vs. Thom Browne | BRANDIT - Making brands feel at home](https://brandit.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Adidas-vs-Browne-image.png)
The battle of the “three stripes” continues: Adidas vs. Thom Browne | BRANDIT - Making brands feel at home
Lubbe NO and others v Millennium Style (Pty) Ltd and others; In re Lubbe NO and others v Millenium Style (Pty) Ltd [2007] 4 All
![Ye or nay? Yeezy sneaker sales soar as fans, companies split on giving Kanye West the boot | CBC News Ye or nay? Yeezy sneaker sales soar as fans, companies split on giving Kanye West the boot | CBC News](https://i.cbc.ca/1.6631861.1666895599!/cpImage/httpImage/ye-adidas.jpg)
Ye or nay? Yeezy sneaker sales soar as fans, companies split on giving Kanye West the boot | CBC News
![Michael Atkins - Seattle Trademark Lawyer - Oregon Jury Awards $305 Million to Adidas for Payless Shoe Infringement Michael Atkins - Seattle Trademark Lawyer - Oregon Jury Awards $305 Million to Adidas for Payless Shoe Infringement](http://seattletrademarklawyer.com/storage/Adidas%20America%20v.%20Payless%20Shoesource%20-%20Verdict%20Shot3.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1210137297734)